I couldn't agree more strongly with Théo . As Colin Davis said when he took over at the LSO, what the orchestra needed was to play a great deal of Mozart and Haydn, string tone often having been the Achilles heel of London orchestras. Davis has also said that, of works he would most still like to record he would most like to record, he would choose the St Matthew Passion, but noted that, alas, the 'specialists' would never allow that. As our good host points out, the present situation would have been incomprehensible to great conductors of the past, whether Walter, Klemperer, Mengelberg, or Furtwängler. How is one to hear the Bach in Mahler, let alone the Mahler in Bach, if one does not know Bach - and know him intimately? Even if one were to take the ayatollah-like view that Bach and Handel were and could only be chamber music, it would be necessary to play them for that reason alone. Those would confine Bach, Mozart, Monteverdi, or anyone else, to a (generally grossly mis...
Comments
You might like to know that I have put three samples from the last concert onto the Voces website.
Go to www.voceschoral.webs.com and click on 'Listen to us'.
More passion than polish, but none the worse for that, and the audience feedback has been terrific. A pity about the unmuffled coughing...
With best wishes,
Martyn Warren, Director
Voces - Renaissance Choral Music
Newton Abbot
Devon
Voces previousl featured here http://www.overgrownpath.com/2008/03/what-price-music-of-unsung-master.html
One comment on your 'Wouldn't it be lovely' post this morning: I suspect that most classical musicians love to talk about their music - their passion. The problem is that, unless one is in the superstar category, the general media will only want to talk with a classical musician if he or she has something to 'sell' - either literally, as in concert tickets or CDs, or metaphorically in the shape of radical new ideas, great success, great disaster, or scandal. Admittedly my experience is at a pretty low level, trying to interest local/regional print and broadcast media, but I suspect it is typical.
Things have changed markedly in the last 10 to 15 years. In the past our regional newspaper had an arts editor, who attended events in person and interviewed artists - no more. The BBC local news programme had a 5-minute slot on a Friday evening previewing upcoming arts events - no more. I had no trouble interesting local radio in mini-features based around our music, and more than once have spent a happy hour in a radio studio chatting live about renaissance choral music and my choir - I don't expect that to happen again.
I am generalising from the specific, and I am sure that you will get opposing views.
Best wishes, and keep up the good work,
Martyn
Too often we, and I include myself in this, blame the musicians for attention seeking.
But in many cases the musicians are hostages, willing or otherwise, of the commercial/intermediary complex, and of the media and agents in particular.
Which brings us back to the question that my article linked to above asks. Who is benefitting from disintermediation in classical music? Is it the music, or is it the commercial/intermediary complex?
But I am becoming incresingly uncomfortable with the concept that "Classical Music needs all the help it can get."
Just think today's BBC Radio 3, Norman Lebrecht, and the Classical Brit Awards etc etc.
Classical music needs help, but it needs the right kind of help. Many of the problems facing classical music today have been caused by the greed of the middle feeders who have used the mantra that "Classical Music needs all the help it can get" to further their own agendas.
Defining the right kind of help is very difficult, if not impossible. But we can at least try.