Classical music still has more money than sense


Alex Ross reports in the New Yorker that Valery Gergiev’s annual income is said to be $16.5 million. Recordings of Hans Gal's Symphonies by Kenneth Woods and of Missy Mazolli's new opera about Isabelle Eberhardt are just two important recent projects that relied on crowdfunding. $13,500 was needed to deliver the acclaimed Hans Gal Symphonies; which is 0.08% of the amount reportedly paid each year to Gergiev by arts organisations around the world. As funders search for yet more savings, what is the defence against the accusation that classical music still has more money than sense?

Also on Facebook and Twitter. Any copyrighted material on these pages is included as "fair use", for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis only, and will be removed at the request of copyright owner(s).

Comments

Recent popular posts

Travels beyond TripAdvisor

Critical Mass

Boulez - great bogeyman of 20th century music

The purpose of puffery and closed-mindedness

Are top musicians sharing the financial pain?

Dare to be different

Classical music's biggest problem is that no one cares

How classical music became a pseudo-event

What price the BBC Proms?

No such thing as an unknown Venezuelan conductor