Classical music still has more money than sense


Alex Ross reports in the New Yorker that Valery Gergiev’s annual income is said to be $16.5 million. Recordings of Hans Gal's Symphonies by Kenneth Woods and of Missy Mazolli's new opera about Isabelle Eberhardt are just two important recent projects that relied on crowdfunding. $13,500 was needed to deliver the acclaimed Hans Gal Symphonies; which is 0.08% of the amount reportedly paid each year to Gergiev by arts organisations around the world. As funders search for yet more savings, what is the defence against the accusation that classical music still has more money than sense?

Also on Facebook and Twitter. Any copyrighted material on these pages is included as "fair use", for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis only, and will be removed at the request of copyright owner(s).

Comments

Recent popular posts

A massive hope for the future

Those are my principles....

Classical music's biggest problem is that no one cares

Scott Ross and the paradox of genius

The purpose of puffery and closed-mindedness

While classical music debates nothing changes

The practice of engaged classical music

A vintage year for blasphemy and heresy

Wagner, Mahler and Shostakovich all sound like film music

Master musician who experienced the pain of genius