Great New Year's Day concert - now let's move on

Classical music started 2012 with the traditional New Year's Day concert in Vienna. At which a rich white Judeo-Christian audience wallowed in Western music by long-dead composers played by prejudiced and doubly prejudiced musicians under the baton of a jet set maestro in a showpiece event funded by that ornament of one percenters Rolex (who received a prominent plug on the BBC coverage) and distributed globally by media conglomerates. It was a really wonderful concert and there will doubtless be much self-congratulation about the 50 million people in 72 countries who tuned in to the TV coverage. But less will be made of the 6.95 billion in the other 124 countries who did not make the connection. While classical music debates nothing changes.
Header image shows that Vienna can move on - transcriptions of Strauss waltzes by Schoenberg, Berg and Webern played by the Boston Sympony Chamber Players on my 1979 LP version. Report broken links, missing images and errors to - overgrownpath at hotmail dot co dot uk Also on Facebook and Twitter.
Comments
Again, I understand that wasn't really the point you were trying to make, but I think the intensity with which you go after this specific example undermines your greater point. I'd be surprised if someone thought about tuning in to the New Year's Day concert and then decided not to because it was being financed by Rolex, or because the conductor gets paid hilarious amounts of money.
The self-provided airs of elitism and the sense that the repertoire is frozen in amber don't help, but the rest of it, I don't think, has as much to do with it as you say.
It's interesting to me that many young people today (I am "young people today") view The Great Composers as boring. I wonder if my grandchildren with think that anyone who likes The Beatles is an intellectual elitist.
Two things persuade me to pursue this thread. The first is the huge number of readers attracted by the posts, many from outside classical music. In fact the original post on the subject attracted one of the largest single day readerships since the bog started seven years ago.
The second is that no other high profile blogger, with the notable exception of Alex Ross, has touched the story of ethically-compromised funders, despite the high level of interest in it.
In those circumstances perhaps a little intensity can be forgiven.
Why the tone, if 'it was a really wonderful concert'? Surely good is just good. Or do we have to uncover the negative in everything?
In response to your points:
'The feed for the BBC's television coverage comes from ORF, hence the Rolex advertisement' - I do not follow that one. Why did the continuity announcer for the non-commercial BBC give Rolex a prominent plug? I suspect that in addition to paying ORF a lot of money for the broadcast rights the BBC also agreed to a contract clause obliging it to plug the sponsor. If that was the case what other obligations did the BBC agree to which compromise its editorial freedom? Did the BBC have to use a supplied script for the continuity announcements? - I suspect so from their bland tone. Was there a clause specifying approval of promotional content and limiting critical discussion of the Vienna Philharmonic concert? Why is the BBC, which is publicly funded to the tune of £33 billion, carrying advertising for Rolex? We will probably never know, because, quite scandalously, the broadcast activities of the BBC are exempt from the UK Freedom of Information Act.
'Or do we have to uncover the negative in everything?' - Gavin, this post was part of a thread on classical music sponsorship. Are you seriously suggesting the sponsorship by tobacco companies of the London Philharmonic and Ulster Orchestras, Glyndebourne Festival, Salzburg Whitsun Festival, Mariinsky Theatre and other institutions should be left uncovered? Not to mention the anti-feminist and anti-semitic background of the Vienna Phharmonic.
The sponsorship debate is a valid one. Well done for covering it. But, specifically in relation to your second paragraph, I wonder whether all institutions should now be obliged to accept or reject money on the basis of the companies involved. Should alcoholic sponsorship be subject the same censure? Airlines and fuel companies for irrevocable damage to the environment? Where does it end, particularly when state support dwindles day by day?
There are many examples On An Overgrown Path of praise for the BBC, here are just a few –
http://www.overgrownpath.com/2008/08/is-this-best-british-orchestra.html
http://www.overgrownpath.com/2011/10/rarely-rarely-comest-thou-bbc-spirit-of.html
http://www.overgrownpath.com/2007/10/remembering-forgotten-maestro.html
http://www.overgrownpath.com/2011/10/triumph-of-faith-and-idealism-over.html
My position on the BBCis quite clear and is best restated by quoting from my 2009 post about the BBC Proms.
“My life was changed by a Henry Wood Promenade Concert on 4th August, 1975. In the second half Sir Adrian Boult gave us Vaughan William's Fifth Symphony, and the blazing intensity of that performance remains unmatched, in my experience, in the concert hall or on record….
In 2009 Promenade Concerts are one of few remaining great British institutions. The Empire and Princess Diana have gone. But the Proms, with their signature Last Night, live on. And, just as with the Royal family, it is still considered ungentlemanly to question their role. But On An Overgrown Path was born for opposition. So the following is a rare attempt to discuss the role and price of the BBC Proms…
This article is an expanded version of the notes I prepared when invited recently to take part in a BBC Radio Five live discussion about the Proms. Unfortunately I was not allowed to air these views because, as the programme presenter explained, Roger Wright was not on the programme to answer my points. The BBC's unique dual position of both making and controlling the news about the Proms allows them to implement a policy of if you publish the Wright stuff you get your interview. Not to mention the dual roles played by a number of leading music journalists.”
Hopefully the paragraph above is a clear explanation as to why the BBC is one of many topics covered On An Overgrown Path .
http://www.overgrownpath.com/2009/08/what-price-bbc-proms.html