If it ain't Baroque, don't fix it

'When you think about it, the classics have always rebounded because of advancement in aesthetic conceptions. In his time, Karajan’s legato was a controversial novelty, same for “objective” readings by the likes of Boulez (and before him Klemperer ?) …

The equivalent for these days should be baroque players but I feel that there is a difference in their contribution. Most of the players are very very dogmatic and tend to apply their principles too much beyond baroque composers. Interpretation is subordinated to strict adherence to certain performance principles, no vibrato (glassy string sound …) , fast tempi with lots of rubato, … Baroque contribution should have been a more theatrical feeling to instrumental music or certain different harmonies and inner voices, not what we have. These days, the Berlin Phiharmonic and others are just trying to mimic baroque practices. This just does not make any sense.'
I was reminded of that contribution by Antoine Leboyer to my October 2010 post Just trying to mimic Baroque practices by Nigel Kennedy's Guardian interview. Or as another contributor wrote here recently, Specialisation is damaging classical music.

Also on Facebook and Twitter. Photo is (c) On An Overgrown Path 2011. Report broken links, missing images and errors to - overgrownpath at hotmail dot co dot uk

Comments

Recent popular posts

How to reach a big new post-COVID classical audience

Scott Ross and the paradox of genius

Because we will never again sow division

The Berlin Philharmonic's darkest hour

Critical Mass

The truth about those French orchestras

Philippa Schuyler - genius or genetic experiment?

She made her life a bridge for others to cross

Quite simply glorious music - and what is wrong with that?

No such thing as an unknown Venezuelan conductor