If it ain't Baroque, don't fix it

'When you think about it, the classics have always rebounded because of advancement in aesthetic conceptions. In his time, Karajan’s legato was a controversial novelty, same for “objective” readings by the likes of Boulez (and before him Klemperer ?) …

The equivalent for these days should be baroque players but I feel that there is a difference in their contribution. Most of the players are very very dogmatic and tend to apply their principles too much beyond baroque composers. Interpretation is subordinated to strict adherence to certain performance principles, no vibrato (glassy string sound …) , fast tempi with lots of rubato, … Baroque contribution should have been a more theatrical feeling to instrumental music or certain different harmonies and inner voices, not what we have. These days, the Berlin Phiharmonic and others are just trying to mimic baroque practices. This just does not make any sense.'
I was reminded of that contribution by Antoine Leboyer to my October 2010 post Just trying to mimic Baroque practices by Nigel Kennedy's Guardian interview. Or as another contributor wrote here recently, Specialisation is damaging classical music.

Also on Facebook and Twitter. Photo is (c) On An Overgrown Path 2011. Report broken links, missing images and errors to - overgrownpath at hotmail dot co dot uk

Comments

Recent popular posts

Four great albums that are victims of clickbait correctness

Scott Ross and the paradox of genius

How to reach a big new post-COVID classical audience

What the law of diminishing diversity tells us

The paradox of the Dalai Lama

Classical music must face the facts - click bait pays

Missing so much and so much.........

How classical music ignored the awakening electronic dream

Classical's elusive young audience wants chewy music