Coup for classics?

I was disappointed to see the excellent Britten Sinfonia using Stephen Fry and Paul Gambaccini to introduce concerts in Cambridge and Peterboro' last week, a move described in the press as a 'Coup for classics'. I am aware the concerts were in aid of a deserving conservation project, and the programme included a commission from Associate Artistic Director of the Aldeburgh Festival John Woolrich. But for many, including some who attend Britten Sinfonia concerts, overexposed media celebrities such as Stephen Fry and Paul Gambaccini are as much part of our current problems as bankers, and certainly have no place in the solution.

Stephen Fry (above) has given high profile support to chat show host Jonathan Ross, who last year was responsible for one of the most sordid incidents in the BBC's long history. Paul Gambaccini's presentation style while a BBC Radio 3 presenter was described variously as ingratiating, unctuous, schmaltzy, egregious, patronising and totally inane. Gambaccini was actually taken off the air by Radio 3 because of adverse reactions to his programme. Believe me, to be dropped by BBC Radio 3 is quite an achievement.

I am pretty sure posts like this do not make enjoyable reading. In fact I was going to let the story pass and spend time on something more positive. But today Stephen Fry has appeared in a video clip on the BBC website telling us that the current row in the UK over politicians expenses is "not that important, it really isn't" and that he himself has "cheated things and fiddled things". If this is what it takes to reach new audiences for classical music, surely we are better off finding fresh ways to work with existing audiences?

Any copyrighted material on these pages is included as "fair use", for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis only, and will be removed at the request of copyright owner(s). Report errors to - overgrownpath at hotmail dot co dot uk


King and Pawn said…
I think I'm missing what you're looking for? More coverage for 'classical' music, but only by people you don't disagree with?

I'm curious, who would you suggest instead?
Pliable said…
tom said…
There is an almost universal tendency in every area of human artistic endeavour of promotion through celebrity endorsement. It is, of course, usually meaningless. Its not that I am against endorsements, rather the opposite as I warm to hearing anyone who is knowledgable and passionate on any subject. But when I feel that the celebrity is'nt really there because of any particular interest or passion but is only there to add a bit of surface gravitas (to put it at its most generous) then I usually feel I am being patronised.
Pliable said…
Tom, beautifully put.

Bayan Northcott described Paul Gambaccini's presentation style as characterised by 'refraining from any information commentary or judgement of the slightest musical interest whatever'.In the Art of the Animateur link above Itzhak Perlman is quoted as saying "If something is good, even if it is a little difficult, people will get that it is good."
Pliable said…
"Not that important, it really isn't" -
Pliable said…
"Not that important, it really isn't" -
Pliable said…
"Not that important, it really isn't" -

Recent popular posts

Can streamed music ever be beautiful?

All aboard the Martinu bandwagon

Great music has no independent existence

Mahler that dares to be different

Who are the real classical role models?

The Berlin Philharmonic's darkest hour

Master musician who experienced the pain of genius

He was not an online kind of person

Nada Brahma - Sound is God

Classical music's biggest problem is that no one cares