Wrong, wrong, and wrong again Norman

Norman Lebrecht getting it wrong is so commonplace that it hardly justifies comment. Except when it is a journalist on his own paper pointing it out. Here's Fiona Maddocks writing in the Evening Standard.

Wrong, wrong and wrong again, thundered my colleague, Norman Lebrecht, in yesterday's Evening Standard, thereby guaranteeing the BBC's forthcoming Tchaikovsky Experience more curiosity and interest than the corporation's publicity department could have dreamed of affording.

His attack was on the BBC's cultural turpitude in general, and the choice of the all-time "chocolate box" composer for this wall-to-wall, complete works treatment in particular. The BBC, no doubt, can fend for itself. But the view that Tchaikovsky's music is merely decorative and devoid of deeper meaning is now so outdated that I must urge Norman, politely, to get out more.

Recent major studies by Richard Taruskin and Stephen Walsh have reminded us - though our ears tell us plainly - that Tchaikovsky was a key influence on Stravinsky, the towering musical genius of the last century. Shostakovich acknowledged his debt in every note he wrote. The list goes on.

A little known aspect of Tchaikovsky's work featured in a short, perfectly executed concert at the
Russian Orthodox Cathedral in Ennismore Gardens (above), for broadcast on Radio 3 on 14 February. The All-Night Vigil Opus 52, or Vespers, sets liturgical texts for mixed voices. Ancient chant combines with the ardent choral writing we know from Tchaikovsky's operas, here stripped bare but still radiant and full-bodied. The challenge to the performers, nearly an hour of vigorous unaccompanied singing, was met with masterly skill by the BBC Singers. Intonation was impressive, their attempt at a Russian sound quality highly creditable.

Three settings by Stravinsky, whose music also forms part of this Radio 3 season, were interpolated. The musical colours here shifted to snowy silvergreys, hushed and pure compared with the burnished golds of the Tchaikovsky. Both composers had decidedly unorthodox relationships with God but these works are a revelation to ear and mind. Those who dismiss Tchaikovsky as sugarladen schmaltz will, if they keep an open mind, discover through his music that the heart has an intellect all of its own.

Now for a bargain CD recommendation of the Tchikovsky Vespers visit Brilliant Russian sacred choral music
Any copyrighted material on these pages is included as "fair use", for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis only, and will be removed at the request of copyright owner(s). Report broken links, missing images and other errors to - overgrownpath at hotmail dot co dot uk


Civic Center said…
"But the view that Tchaikovsky's music is merely decorative and devoid of deeper meaning is now so outdated that I must urge Norman, politely, to get out more."

Now that, Mr. Pliable, is a beautiful and genuine smackdown. And I totally agree with you about Tchaikovsky's music. There are half a dozen pieces that are overplayed to death and an extraordinary body of work that nobody knows about. I just saw his "Maid of Orleans" opera in San Francisco recently and was astonished once again at how good the music is. In fact, just about all of his output is getting better with the passage of time.

Recent popular posts

A street cat named Aleppo

Master musician who experienced the pain of genius

The Berlin Philharmonic's darkest hour

The act of killing from 20,000 feet

Storm clouds gather over Aldeburgh

In the shadow of Chopin

How classical music slipped a disc

Benjamin Brittten's relationship with children

Whatever happened to the long tail of composers?

Critical Mass