Why distance lends enchantment to classical music
A sultry summer's evening and a Mahler symphony, it can only be the priceless Proms. But, while last night's BBC Radio 3 broadcast delivered Mahler's Fifth played by the Bamberg Symphony Orchestra under Jonathan Nott in full-blooded sound, it failed to deliver the unique sonic atmosphere of the Albert Hall. Last year I cited the Radio 3 relay of Elgar's The Apostles from the Proms as a topical example of the curse of close-miking, and yesterday's Mahler symphony provided yet another example with the sonic signature of the venue traded for impact, with the spotlit harp in the Adagietto sounding like a bass guitar and with the heavy hand of the balance engineer squashing Mahler's dynamics in the Rondo-Finale.
Portable audio players bring the music up close and personal, so recordings and broadcasts are now balanced up close and personal. Yet distance is a vital element of classical music, as Sir Adrian Boult - a veteran of the Proms and under whose baton some of the best sounding recordings ever were made - eloquently explains in the anthology of his writings titled Boult on Music:
Whenever I am able to reach the top gallery of the Royal Albert Hall, I always feel it is an ideal place to listen from. The sound is clear and the quality is somehow purified, and the balance far better than anywhere else in the Hall. It isn't at all necessary to sit in front; in fact I prefer the back... you can see nothing, and as there are not many chairs you find people lying on the floor drinking in the sound in a dedicated and impersonal atmosphere. It is the music that matters up there not the performer. So there are, I think, occasions when distance lends enchantment, and space, in two senses of the term, is a help to the ideal projection of fine music.What wisdom: 'people lying on the floor drinking in the sound in a dedicated and impersonal atmosphere' resonates with Jonathan Harvey's thoughts on classical traditions, and 'it is the music that matters up there not the performer' resonates with today's cult of the celebrity musician. Sir Adrian's reference to distance lending enchantment is not just whimsy. Enchantment, magic, ineffability or whatever you want to call it, is not a 'nice to have' in a Mahler symphony or any other great music; it is a 'must have'. Classical music's failure to connect with contemporary audiences is because it has been stripped of its enchantment and reduced to no more than a string of binary digits. Classical music has no fixed center than can be captured by binary digits alone, and it will only connect when the 'experts' finally realise that it is a vast process, an ever-moving stream of becomings and extinctions, a series of psychophysical reactions and responses with no fixed center or unchanging ego-entity, of which sound is just one small part. And if those words sound surprisingly eloquent for this blog it is because they are paraphrased from Nancy Wilson Ross' Buddhism: A Way of Life and Thought - this is the quote in context:
At his Enlightenment Gautama saw himself and all life as a vast process, an ever-moving stream of becomings and extinctions, and within this ever-moving flow and interpenetration of energies he recognised as delusion the idea of the existence of an individual ego. What was taken for the "self" was actually a composite of various aggregates, a series of psychophysical reactions and responses with no fixed center or unchanging ego-entity.It is of great significance that Sir Adrian's book, which was published in the technologically dark age of the 1980s, is sub-titled Words from a Lifetime's Communication. What wisdom can be found in the writings quoted in this post. And what great delusions classical music labours under today.
My photo, which I took in the Albert Hall but not from the gods that Sir Adrian writes about (does anyone still call them the gods?), is (c) On An Overgrown Path 2013. Any other copyrighted material on these pages is included as "fair use", for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis only, and will be removed at the request of copyright owner(s). No freebies were used in this post. Also on Facebook and Twitter.
At this point I will answer somewhat evasively that I am still - at the ripe old age of 63! - a seeker in these matters, and quote, again Nancy Wilson Ross - "Buddhist philosophers do not shrink from paradox and contradiction... on the contrary, not only do they seem to accept them easily, as a part of life's inexplicability, they even appear to delight in them".
And yes, I will return to the audio/mixing side of classical music music. How right you are to say that the associated issues are "as complex and as vital to the effects of music as knowing how to play your instrument - and at least as challenging to master". Yet, I will wager,that among the hundreds (thousands?) of tweets about that Mahler Prom not one will touch on sound quality.
I have not touched on this bold and commendable piece of programming by the BBC simply because it did not fit in with the theme of what I wanted to be a fairly tight post. In any case, Mark Berry blogging at the Boulezian says it far better than I could - http://boulezian.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/prom-5-arditti-qtbamberg-sonott.html