Ruth Kelly and pederastic singers

Tony Blair's Education Secretary Ruth Kelly has had a torrid week over her department's decision to to allow a registered sex offender to work as a Physical Education teacher in a Norfolk school. The furore reminded me of this musical story:

For the first performance of John Tavener's The Cappermakers at Charleston Manor in 1964, students from the Royal Academy and the Royal College were bolstered by professionals. Tavener (right) himself conducted, and Francis Steiner took the prominent piano part in the ensemble, which consisted otherwise of woodwind, horn, trumpet, harp and string quintet. The chorus was the St Christopher Singers, who also provided the male trio to sing the part of Christ. One solo tenor and one baritone shared the parts of Lazarus and the four Jews.

In a volume of Stravinsky's conversations, Tavener had read the great composer's description of the part of Satan in his opera The Flood: 'a high, slightly pederastic tenor'. Having no idea what 'pederastic' meant, but assuming it was a musical term, and loving the sound of Satan on the recording of The Flood, John urged his soloists to sing more pederastically. One of them 'turned the colour of an orange', he remembers. During the next break in rehearsals, someone explained to Tavener what a pederast was

From Geoffrey Haydon's biography John Tavener - Glimpses of Paradise (Gollancz ISBN 575057033)

Report broken links, missing images and other errors to - overgrownpath at hotmail dot co dot uk
Image credit: John Tavener linked from
Image owners - if you do not want your picture used in this article please contact me and it will be removed. If bandwidth is a problem with your permission I will host your image.
If you enjoyed this post take An Overgrown Path to Classic misunderstandings - Beethoven's movements


Johnny Chang said…
COnsidering its john Taverner - not much of a surprise.
Pliable said…
That's an interesting blog Echo, well worth clicking over to - particularly nice graphics.

Not wishing to be pedantic but there is a bit of confusion that is easily made. John Taverner is the wonderful, and important, 16th century composer, while John Tavener is the contemporary composer whose particular talents often seem to remain hidden behind a protecting veil.
Hucbald said…
Funny story,but...

I'm sorry, the moment I saw that picture of Tavener I thought, "Why, that man's a KLINGON!" LOL!

Recent popular posts

A tale of two new audiences

Does it have integrity and relevance?

Is classical music obsessed by existential angst?

Will this attract young audiences? - discuss

New music for old instruments

The Berlin Philharmonic's darkest hour

Why new audiences are deaf to classical music

Master musician who experienced the pain of genius

Nada Brahma - Sound is God

The excruciating boredom of pure fact