Wednesday, September 01, 2010

Classical music should drop its silly conventions

'Young people don't like concert halls... and wouldn't normally go to one except for amplified music. There is a big divide between amplified and non-amplified music... The future must bring things which are considered blasphemous like amplifying classical music in an atmosphere where people can come and go and even talk perhaps.. and certainly leave in the middle of a movement if they feel like it. Nobody should be deprived of classical music, least of all by silly conventions.'
That is Jonathan Harvey talking about the future of classical music in an exclusive interview being broadcast and webcast on Future Radio on Sunday Sept 4. Which is the day after the composer's choral work Dum transisset sabbatum is being performed at a BBC Prom.

Jonathan Harvey is seen above talking to me at his home in Sussex during the recording. In the interview he talks about musicians he has known including Benjamin Britten, Hans Keller, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Milton Babbitt and Pierre Boulez. He also discusses his deep interest in mystical religions and the musical topics range from the future of classical music to serialism and spectralism. The interview concludes with Jonathan Harvey giving an invaluable introduction to his new composition for large orchestra and electronics, Speakings, and this is followed by a complete recorded performance of the work.

There is some priceless material in the interview so it is being made available in several formats. The broadcast version is being aired on FM locally in Norwich, England and worldwide via the internet at 3.00pm UK time this Sunday Sept 5, with a repeat for North American listeners at 1.00am the following morning, i.e. the night of Sept 5-6. (Time zone convertor here.) This broadcast will be a 28 minute edited interview ending with Jonathan Harvey introducing a full performance of Speakings which lasts for another 28 minutes. Because some content has been edited out to achieve the broadcast timing, the on-demand streamed version, which contains the complete interview unedited is now available here. This runs for 55 minutes plus the performance of Speakings.

Below is some background to the interview. On An Overgrown Path is now taking a break to allow my laptop to cool down, so there may be a delay in moderating comments and replying to emails. While I am away do support other music blogs here and here.

* The interview with Jonathan Harvey was recorded using the Zoom H2 recorder I am seen holding in the upper photo. Sound quality recording in MP3 format at 320kbp is excellent, but inevitably these recorders do pick up some handling noise. Expert editing was by volunteer editor Tim Wilds in the Future Radio studios using Adobe Audition software. (Good luck at Goldsmiths College Tim!) Silly conventions were ignored in the final edit, so the performance of Speakings starts under Jonathan Harvey's voice and ends under mine. This is because the opening and closing bars are extremely quiet and without the overlap it sounded as though the broadcast had broken down. (Yes, I know.)

** My thanks go to Jonathan Harvey for making time available before a demanding trip to Japan, and to John Cronin who helped set it up. The interview could not have happened without the tireless support of Future Radio; if you appreciate their backing please send them a message saying so. All my work for the station is done on a pro bono basis. The recording of Speakings is on a new Aeon CD of Jonathan Harvey's music recorded by the BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra conducted by Ilan Volkov.


Also available on Twitter and Facebook. Photos are (c) On An Overgrown Path 2010. The Aeon CD Speakings was supplied as a requested review sample. Report broken links, missing images and errors to - overgrownpath at hotmail dot co dot uk

10 comments:

Pliable said...

Going viral - http://twitter.com/alexrossmusic/status/22736434137

Pliable said...

Future Radio tell me that due to the exceptional level of interest in the Jonathan Harvey interview they are repeating it twice more; at 3.00pm on Sunday Sept 12 and 1.00am overnight Sept 12-13.

Very pleasing for a programme that is 100% contemporary music.

Paul Brownsey said...

Jonathan Harvey wants to see "an atmosphere where people can come and go and even talk perhaps.. and certainly leave in the middle of a movement if they feel like it. Nobody should be deprived of classical music, least of all by silly conventions.'"

When I go to a classical concert I want to listen to the music and not be disturbed by others' chatter or by the noise and distraction of people moving in and out. That people shouldn't talk in concerts and should stay put while the music is being played are not "silly conventions". Shame on Harvey for pandering to the lack of consideration for others which is so prevalent today. I never go to non-classical concerts just because people talk as though in their living-room at home, sing along, eat and drink, move about, get up and dance... And theatres are going that way, too.

Harvey needs to watch his English, too. It is a gross misuse of "deprives" to say that someone is deprived of classical music if they won't go to concerts because they have to shut up while the music is playing.

Pliable said...

Paul, there are always two sides to any debate and I am happy to publish your view.

But I would say that the quotes need to be placed in context by hearing the whole interview. Jonathan Harvey is talking specifically about reaching younger audiences. He is not proposing a wholesale change to the way concerts are presented.

Surely his ideas follow on from Boulez's Roundhouse concerts in London and 'rug' concerts in New York?

As above I am travelling so comment moderation may be delayed. (And I am just about to miss my flight!) But I am interested to learn what other readers think of Jonathan Harvey's ideas and Paul Brownsey's response.

Scott said...

I'm with Brownsey. I take your point about context, but if the context makes that much difference, perhaps you could have published a somewhat more representative quote.

As it stands, his commments about "silly conventions" just sound ... well, silly.

peter.woolf1 said...

Extremely valuable survey of all the "isms" he has studied in depth from serialism to spectralism, a wide ranging review of all the influences to which he has opened his exploratory mind and heart; should be published, but best heard in Harvey's own quiet, persuasive voice.
A remarkable interview.

Grant said...

I'm glad to have run across this post (and blog for that matter). I had seen a Guardian article that contains parts of the interview, but hadn't see this yet.

That article inspired me to share some thoughts, suggesting basically that it might do the classical music world some real good to relax and cede some control. If you're interested, I'd be happy to have you read the whole post I did, which is available here

I was also wondering, more specifically related to Paul's comment above, what the real role of audience etiquette was in classical music, so I asked the community. (You can read that here if you're interested.) The conversation that ensued was interesting, and it bolstered my support for Harvey's comments. When it comes down to it, Paul Brownsey is right. But, he's only right based on a certain set of assumptions. I think those assumptions should be challenged. I think Harvey is getting to a deeper level, suggesting that we should (in some cases) stop expecting "to listen to music an not be disturbed by others."

Thanks for this post (now that I know about it, I linked to it in the relevant post on my site).

Grant Charles Chaput
KillingClassicalMusic.com

Paul Brownsey said...

What are the assumptions on which my comment was based, and why should those assumptions be challenged?

I don't much care one way or another about applause between movements, but many of the other objectionable phenomena here derive to a considerable extent from lack of consideration for other people; derive from the idea that if *I* fancy chatting or eating or singing along or snogging in a concert hall, then I am entitled to do so, and if other people don't like it (other people who have paid good money to listen to music, not to me), then that is 'their problem'. It's the same mentality that insists that if you don't like the noise of my 2 a.m. parties throbbing through the wall, that's 'your problem'.

Pliable said...

Interesting experiment which drops some of those silly conventions -

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/sep/21/tristan-und-isolde-viola-philharmonia

Pliable said...

As is this - http://www.oae.co.uk/standard.asp?ID=68